Amsterdam Gender Theory Research Team (AGTRT)
Home
Blog
Themes
Documents
Mission
About us
English
Nederlands
Blog
All FGT blogs
All ABGT blogs
All TS blogs
Formal Gender Theory
,
Theoretical Sexology
[AGTRT-BF57] Gender theory abstracts from sexuality, offering opportunities for new theorizing about sexuality
Formal Gender Theory
,
Theoretical Sexology
5 March 2024
Formal Gender Theory
[AGTRT-BF56] How can concept engineering of the concept of formal gender help eliminate polarization in the debate?
Formal Gender Theory
1 March 2024
Formal Gender Theory
[AGTRT-BF55] The ICE method monitors the consistency of the overall argumentation when a definition of gender is changed
Formal Gender Theory
29 February 2024
Formal Gender Theory
[AGTRT-BF54] A change in the definition of gender must be firmly justified with ICE
Formal Gender Theory
28 February 2024
Formal Gender Theory
[AGTRT-BF53] Kirk-Gianinni’s work has a binary premise, and that seems to be a drawback
Formal Gender Theory
27 February 2024
Formal Gender Theory
[AGTRT-BF52] Arnout Jaspers lashes out at woke, but needs to phrase his criticism more carefully
Formal Gender Theory
26 February 2024
Formal Gender Theory
[AGTRT-BF51] Cameron Domenico Kirk-Gianinni gives an alternative to ICE: decremental concept engineering
Formal Gender Theory
25 February 2024
Formal Gender Theory
[AGTRT-BF50] Not everyone will be keen on the ICE methodology in discussions about gender
Formal Gender Theory
24 February 2024
Formal Gender Theory
[AGTRT-BF49] Cameron Domenico Kirk-Giannini: another step in the concept engineering of gender
Formal Gender Theory
20 February 2024
«
‹
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
›
»
Search blog posts:
Search
![[AGTRT-BF57] Gender theory abstracts from sexuality, offering opportunities for new theorizing about sexuality](https://gender-theory.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ac194-sculpture-1111260_1280-870x418-1.jpg)
![[AGTRT-BF56] How can concept engineering of the concept of formal gender help eliminate polarization in the debate?](https://gender-theory.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ffd06-screenshot-2024-03-01-at-16.13.10.png)
![[AGTRT-BF55] The ICE method monitors the consistency of the overall argumentation when a definition of gender is changed](https://gender-theory.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/be5e1-consis.jpg)
![[AGTRT-BF54] A change in the definition of gender must be firmly justified with ICE](https://gender-theory.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/6b5bb-img_7402.jpg)
![[AGTRT-BF53] Kirk-Gianinni’s work has a binary premise, and that seems to be a drawback](https://gender-theory.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/0688e-binary.png)
![[AGTRT-BF52] Arnout Jaspers lashes out at woke, but needs to phrase his criticism more carefully](https://gender-theory.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ee23c-img_7394-1.jpg)
![[AGTRT-BF51] Cameron Domenico Kirk-Gianinni gives an alternative to ICE: decremental concept engineering](https://gender-theory.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/7f32a-img_7368-1.jpg)
![[AGTRT-BF50] Not everyone will be keen on the ICE methodology in discussions about gender](https://gender-theory.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/409ff-img_7367-1.jpg)
![[AGTRT-BF49] Cameron Domenico Kirk-Giannini: another step in the concept engineering of gender](https://gender-theory.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/5ddf6-img_7325-1.jpg)